Simple solution is for you to prove it.
2024 General Elections Thread
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
No I proved your Nazi bullshit, and you still deny it using “comprehension” - when Brad called bullshit on you.
You are like Trump - you will never admit being wrong, even when confronted with the truth.
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
US raises alarm over Georgia’s elections
The U.S. and European allies are raising alarm over Georgia’s elections, where the Russian-friendly ruling party Georgian Dream (GD) claimed victory over opposition parties that have refused to recognize the results, accused the Kremlin of meddling and called for mass protests.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, joined by some of his counterparts, has held back on recognizing GD’s victory and called for investigations into the elections.
https://thehill.com/policy/internationa ... ope-alarm/
The U.S. and European allies are raising alarm over Georgia’s elections, where the Russian-friendly ruling party Georgian Dream (GD) claimed victory over opposition parties that have refused to recognize the results, accused the Kremlin of meddling and called for mass protests.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, joined by some of his counterparts, has held back on recognizing GD’s victory and called for investigations into the elections.
https://thehill.com/policy/internationa ... ope-alarm/
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
Ohio Supreme Court rules Atty. Gen. Dave Yost erred in rejecting voter rights petition
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that Attorney General Dave Yost did not have the authority to reject an effort to place a voting rights amendment on the ballot because of its title.
The court, in a unanimous decision issued Wednesday, found that the attorney general can only review the summary of the petition, but not the title.
https://www.wvxu.org/2024-10-30/ohio-su ... s-petition
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that Attorney General Dave Yost did not have the authority to reject an effort to place a voting rights amendment on the ballot because of its title.
The court, in a unanimous decision issued Wednesday, found that the attorney general can only review the summary of the petition, but not the title.
https://www.wvxu.org/2024-10-30/ohio-su ... s-petition
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
Supreme Court allows Virginia to remove suspected non-citizens from voter rolls
The Supreme Court on Wednesday temporarily blocked an order by a federal judge that would have required Virginia to return more than 1,600 people to the voter rolls. U.S. District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles found that since early August the state had canceled the registration of more than 1,600 voters – at least some of whom were U.S. citizens eligible to vote – under a program intended to remove suspected noncitizens from the voting rolls.
In a brief unsigned order on Wednesday morning, the justices granted Virginia’s request to put Giles’ order on hold while a challenge to it continues. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson indicated that they would have denied the state’s request.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/10/supr ... ter-rolls/
The Supreme Court on Wednesday temporarily blocked an order by a federal judge that would have required Virginia to return more than 1,600 people to the voter rolls. U.S. District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles found that since early August the state had canceled the registration of more than 1,600 voters – at least some of whom were U.S. citizens eligible to vote – under a program intended to remove suspected noncitizens from the voting rolls.
In a brief unsigned order on Wednesday morning, the justices granted Virginia’s request to put Giles’ order on hold while a challenge to it continues. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson indicated that they would have denied the state’s request.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/10/supr ... ter-rolls/
-
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2024 8:58 pm
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
So, it’s a hold.ap215 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:45 pm Supreme Court allows Virginia to remove suspected non-citizens from voter rolls
The Supreme Court on Wednesday temporarily blocked an order by a federal judge that would have required Virginia to return more than 1,600 people to the voter rolls. U.S. District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles found that since early August the state had canceled the registration of more than 1,600 voters – at least some of whom were U.S. citizens eligible to vote – under a program intended to remove suspected noncitizens from the voting rolls.
In a brief unsigned order on Wednesday morning, the justices granted Virginia’s request to put Giles’ order on hold while a challenge to it continues. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson indicated that they would have denied the state’s request.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/10/supr ... ter-rolls/
“But in a one-paragraph order on Wednesday morning, the court granted the state’s request to put Giles’ order on hold while the challenge to the voter-purge program continues in the lower court.”
https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/10/supr ... ter-rolls/
Additional note.
“ Virginia has same-day voter registration meaning that any eligible voter who was removed from the rolls should still be able to vote on Election Day or during the early voting period that ends on Nov. 2.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... rcna177673
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
in this case “hold” means they an continue no matter what federal law says. Isn’t that great?Greengrass wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 1:29 pm So, it’s a hold.
“But in a one-paragraph order on Wednesday morning, the court granted the state’s request to put Giles’ order on hold while the challenge to the voter-purge program continues in the lower court.”
https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/10/supr ... ter-rolls/
Additional note.
“ Virginia has same-day voter registration meaning that any eligible voter who was removed from the rolls should still be able to vote on Election Day or during the early voting period that ends on Nov. 2.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... rcna177673
So much for rule of law.
-
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2024 8:58 pm
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
Who cares about the rule of law?
-
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2024 8:58 pm
-
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2024 8:58 pm
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
No. The order to stop from the judge is on hold. The governor can continue the purge.Greengrass wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 3:13 pm No. It Is on hold waiting for a lower court decision.
Citizens still vote.
-
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2024 8:58 pm
-
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2024 8:58 pm
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
So here’s the law
“A) A State shall complete, not later than 90 days prior to the date of a primary or general election for Federal office, any program the purpose of which is to systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters.
(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not be construed to preclude—
(i) the removal of names from official lists of voters on a basis described in paragraph (3)(A) or (B) or (4)(A) of subsection (a); or
(ii) correction of registration records pursuant to this chapter.”
“Systematically” is an interesting qualifier. That would be a program to purge based on a failure to vote for 10 years.
In this case it’s an external list of self identified non citizens.
So “ (A) at the request of the registrant;” applies
Here’s the link
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/20507
“A) A State shall complete, not later than 90 days prior to the date of a primary or general election for Federal office, any program the purpose of which is to systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters.
(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not be construed to preclude—
(i) the removal of names from official lists of voters on a basis described in paragraph (3)(A) or (B) or (4)(A) of subsection (a); or
(ii) correction of registration records pursuant to this chapter.”
“Systematically” is an interesting qualifier. That would be a program to purge based on a failure to vote for 10 years.
In this case it’s an external list of self identified non citizens.
So “ (A) at the request of the registrant;” applies
Here’s the link
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/20507
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
Who needs rule of law when you have a Supreme Court that ignores it?Greengrass wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 4:26 pm So here’s the law
“A) A State shall complete, not later than 90 days prior to the date of a primary or general election for Federal office, any program the purpose of which is to systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters.
(B) Subparagraph (A) shall not be construed to preclude—
(i) the removal of names from official lists of voters on a basis described in paragraph (3)(A) or (B) or (4)(A) of subsection (a); or
(ii) correction of registration records pursuant to this chapter.”
“Systematically” is an interesting qualifier. That would be a program to purge based on a failure to vote for 10 years.
In this case it’s an external list of self identified non citizens.
So “ (A) at the request of the registrant;” applies
Here’s the link
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/20507
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
Pennsylvania judge extends mail ballot deadline after Trump lawsuit
WASHINGTON, Oct 30 (Reuters) - A judge in the swing state of Pennsylvania extended until Friday the deadline for Bucks County voters to request a mail-in ballot after Donald Trump's campaign sued alleging that some supporters seeking ballots were improperly turned away.
In the lawsuit filed on Wednesday, the Trump campaign along with Republican U.S. Senate candidate Dave McCormick and the Republican National Committee said a county office sent voters home on Tuesday who formed long lines ahead of a 5 p.m. deadline to apply for a mail-in ballot.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-ord ... 024-10-30/
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
So, if an American citizen who is legally registered to vote and was purged from the voters rolls, how would they know they were purged?Greengrass wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 1:29 pm So, it’s a hold.
“But in a one-paragraph order on Wednesday morning, the court granted the state’s request to put Giles’ order on hold while the challenge to the voter-purge program continues in the lower court.”
https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/10/supr ... ter-rolls/
Additional note.
“ Virginia has same-day voter registration meaning that any eligible voter who was removed from the rolls should still be able to vote on Election Day or during the early voting period that ends on Nov. 2.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... rcna177673
What happens if an American citizen who is legally registered to vote and received a mail-in ballot and already voted by mail, how would they know if they were purged and their vote canceled?
When you vote left, you vote right.
-
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2024 8:58 pm
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
Well, those voting in person wouldn’t be on the book. Virginia has same day registration so they register and vote.Number6 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 6:23 pm So, if an American citizen who is legally registered to vote and was purged from the voters rolls, how would they know they were purged?
What happens if an American citizen who is legally registered to vote and received a mail-in ballot and already voted by mail, how would they know if they were purged and their vote canceled?
There is the possibility of notification at the last address they have.
If they get purged after mailing it may get counted.
Keep in mind this is a list of self identified non citizens. Apparently some have gained citizenship afterwards. So they should contact the proper authorities. Or just show up to vote and see if they are on the rolls.
-
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2024 8:58 pm
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
I’d say what I posted calls that into question.
And what about the rule of law that say noncitizens can’t register to vote. Which, by the way, that prohibition is in the same legislation with the purge rule.
Again, self identified non citizens. Those that became citizens afterward can vote on Tuesday.
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
Which is the exact reason progressives want to add 4 justices to SCOTUS
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
Botswana president concedes election defeat, BDP loses power after 58 years
Botswana’s President Mokgweetsi Masisi has conceded defeat as preliminary results showed his governing party lost its parliamentary majority after nearly six decades in power.
Masisi’s concession on Friday came before the final results were announced, with his Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) trailing in fourth place, according to tallies by the electoral commission.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/11/ ... sults-show
Botswana’s President Mokgweetsi Masisi has conceded defeat as preliminary results showed his governing party lost its parliamentary majority after nearly six decades in power.
Masisi’s concession on Friday came before the final results were announced, with his Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) trailing in fourth place, according to tallies by the electoral commission.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/11/ ... sults-show
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
Funny how ever other judge said, yes, but you can’t do purge rolls 90 days before the election, because, you know, LAW, and they won’t be voting anyway.Greengrass wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:38 pm I’d say what I posted calls that into question.
And what about the rule of law that say noncitizens can’t register to vote. Which, by the way, that prohibition is in the same legislation with the purge rule.
Again, self identified non citizens. Those that became citizens afterward can vote on Tuesday.
But the Trump judges say “fuck the law”.
-
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2024 8:58 pm
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
So you don’t understand what the law actually says. Not surprised.
And, of course, citizens can still vote. So, there’s that.
Re: 2024 General Elections Thread
I guess the other judges didn’t either, eh?Greengrass wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:21 am So you don’t understand what the law actually says. Not surprised.
And, of course, citizens can still vote. So, there’s that.
What part of “you can’t do any purges ninety days before an election” do you not understand?