Musk and Donald Trump and the rest of these American conservative fascists who got their asses banned from Twitter, Twitter did that because they're bad for business.
If they come back, it's Twitter that will take the nosedive.
Musk and Donald Trump and the rest of these American conservative fascists who got their asses banned from Twitter, Twitter did that because they're bad for business.
Look at this stupid, stupid bigot.
Cernovich is the creep that started Pizzagate, and here's Apartheid Boy playing footsie with him and crying hunter biden's laptop.When Twitter agreed to sell itself to Elon Musk for $44 billion on April 25, the two parties agreed to specific terms of the merger, signed a document, and filed it to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Musk doesn’t yet own Twitter, and he won’t for many more months, but he is now locked into a contract with the social network’s current management, and there’s a $1 billion penalty at stake if he pulls out. The two sides also agreed to certain rules of behavior for the period before the deal closes. And one day after that agreement was reached, Musk already broke the rules.
What rule did Musk break?
Musk’s agreement with Twitter allows him to tweet about the merger “so long as such Tweets do not disparage [Twitter] or any of its Representatives.”
After Politico reported that Vijaya Gadde, Twitter’s top lawyer and head of trust and safety, had cried in an internal meeting following news of the acquisition, conservative journalist Saagar Enjeti tweeted a screenshot of the article alongside the message: “Vijaya Gadde, the top censorship advocate at Twitter who famously gaslit the world on Joe Rogan’s podcast and censored the Hunter Biden laptop story, is very upset about the @elonmusk takeover.”
Gadde’s team, which is in charge of content moderation decisions at Twitter, briefly blocked a link to an October New York Post article about a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden, son of soon-to-be-US president Joe Biden. It also temporarily locked the Post’s account. The laptop was eventually confirmed to be Biden’s, and then-Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey apologized, saying Twitter made a mistake.
On Tuesday, Musk jumped into the fray, in essence agreeing with Enjeti’s critique of Gadde. “Suspending the Twitter account of a major news organization for publishing a truthful story was obviously incredibly inappropriate,” he tweeted.
Just hours later, Musk replied to a tweet by right-wing conspiracy theorist Mike Cernovich alleging that Twitter lawyer Jim Baker, a former FBI general counsel, “facilitated fraud.”
“Sounds pretty bad …” Musk replied.
Or even this whole country.ZoWie wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 11:48 am "Only" $45 billion. Musk's businesses are in LA, much as these guys ever really locate anywhere, having become transnational the same way terrorists also do. What would $45 billion have done for homelessness in this city? For school lunches? For health insurance for the poor?
Don't start me.
Only goes to show how stupid this guy is, who has been handed every unearned opportunity afforded a child of Apartheid.Musk told the banks he also plans to develop features to grow business revenue, including new ways to make money out of tweets that contain important information or go viral, the sources said.
Ideas he brought up included charging a fee when a third-party website wants to quote or embed a tweet from verified individuals or organizations.
In a tweet earlier this month he subsequently deleted, Musk suggested a raft of changes to the social media giant's Twitter Blue premium subscription service, including slashing its price, banning advertising and giving an option to pay in the cryptocurrency dogecoin. Twitter's premium Blue service now costs $2.99 a month.
In another tweet he deleted, Musk said he wants to reduce Twitter's dependence on advertising for much of its revenue.
Why are the left so afraid of free speechZoWie wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 1:34 pm Elon Musk does not care about extremists, because he is one.
If he has any real convictions at all, as far as I can tell from his rather brutish rantings, they tend toward kleptocracy and rule by the best self-promoters. He'll favor leaders that are most likely to leave him alone to change the world to one of his liking, and then he'll rule it.
Yep, you can sued for hundreds of thousands. No free speech at all.ZoWie wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 2:29 pm I'm not thinking about the work place itself, which obviously is not a democracy and never will be. There is no expectation of free speech.
I'm thinking of the NDOs, in which people agree that they will not say a word even after they're done working there and the company has no financial right to their silence.
Progressives are definitely having a cow over Musk and Twitter.
Oh, actually they do, but they don't get supported by big business advertisers, and you've never heard of them.