It’s obvious you don’t know much about children.
Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
You are big on reading. It’s in the thread. Read.
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
I've never made such an accusation to you. But I know that you're at that point where you start crazy lies and accusations. You always do.
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
Not using my grandkids as props. If you were aware of your sexuality at age 5 I feel sorry for you.carmenjonze wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 8:04 pm
You use your own grandchildren as stick figures and props. Now you're using them in irrelevant rank-pulling.
I knew about my own sexuality by the time I was 5, what does either anecdote have to do with anything.
You and that other conservative idiot still haven't looked at what an actual parent's group, PFLAG, has to say about this law.
Why not?
At age 5 you should be thinking about kindergarten and playing on the play ground and Santa and the tooth fairy.
The furthest thing from your mind should be any adult issues.
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
- carmenjonze
- Posts: 9614
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:06 am
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
What knowledge do you have about being a queer or trans kid in school?
What knowledge do you have about being a queer or trans parent?
And you know this, how?Sex and sexuality does not cross their minds.
________________________________
The way to right wrongs is to
Shine the light of truth on them.
~ Ida B. Wells
________________________________
The way to right wrongs is to
Shine the light of truth on them.
~ Ida B. Wells
________________________________
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see
Yes, they ARE attacking teachers, since they obviously believe they are doing things that need to be outlawed.Bludogdem wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 8:06 pm Well they aren’t attacking teachers. Not a remotely bad thing is said about teachers in the legislation.
And aside from some protection of parents and students rights most of the law has fundamental definitional problems that make it unenforceable. A bit too vague for most judges.
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
You’ve had several off the wall rants in this thread claiming I said shit or taken positions I’ve never mentioned. So yeah. Pot to kettle.
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
I'm not calling you a molester. But we know very well there's no low you won't sink to, is there?JoeMemphis wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 8:11 pm You’ve had several off the wall rants in this thread claiming I said shit or taken positions I’ve never mentioned. So yeah. Pot to kettle.
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see
We have speeding laws. Does that mean everybody speeds? Rules about what topics are appropriate to be discussed with someone else’s minor children doesn’t mean everyone has inappropriate conversations. See how this works? It’s simple.
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
Children under 9 and generally under 10 do not care about adult issues and sexuality does not cross their minds.
As does no other adult issues. Thet are children all they want is to go outside and play.
Issues of the day are of no consequence importance or concern. Around the end of 3rd grade is when that begins. By 4th grade the differences in people is full on noticed.
From kindergarten until after the middle of 3rd grade they don't notice nor care about any of this which the left believes is so important
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
- carmenjonze
- Posts: 9614
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:06 am
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
Your claim:
Back up your claim.The whole “damage the psyche” concept came from a article posted by the Prof.
Link the article that has 'the whole “damage the psyche” concept.'
While you're at it, admit that you yourself buy into the belief that "discussions about sex with 8 year olds" "damagaes their psyche," which is why you uttered that stupid phrase in the first place.
This conservative ideology is the root of labeling teachers "groomers." It's a very old Cold War strategy wielded against gay teachers in the 1970s. It's being repurposed for 2022, and you dimwits are on here dutifully regurgitating it like mindless parrots.
________________________________
The way to right wrongs is to
Shine the light of truth on them.
~ Ida B. Wells
________________________________
The way to right wrongs is to
Shine the light of truth on them.
~ Ida B. Wells
________________________________
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see
The logic is there. If the teachers aren't doing anything wrong, then there is no reason for the law, is there?
This and Critical Race Theory is NOTHING but an attack on teachers and public education.
Of course, the right wants to shut down universal public education and use government money to bankroll religious schooling. Has been for years. Ever since Brown v. Board of Education.
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
Read. You will figure it out. It’ll be good for you.carmenjonze wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 8:17 pm Your claim:
Back up your claim.
Link the article that has 'the whole “damage the psyche” concept.'
While you're at it, admit that you yourself buy into the belief that "discussions about sex with 8 year olds" "damagaes their psyche," which is why you uttered that stupid phrase in the first place.
This conservative ideology is the root of labeling teachers "groomers." It's a very old Cold War strategy wielded against gay teachers in the 1970s. It's being repurposed for 2022, and you dimwits are on here dutifully regurgitating it like mindless parrots.
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see
Thet aren't attacking teachers they simply know that the teacher is going to interject their personal beliefs.
Would you want a 5 year old asking an evangelical Christian teacher about any of this
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
Then WTF did I get a whipping at seven due to an incident involving finding my cousin's playboy magazine?Glennfs wrote: ↑Mon May 23, 2022 8:16 pm Children under 9 and generally under 10 do not care about adult issues and sexuality does not cross their minds.
As does no other adult issues. Thet are children all they want is to go outside and play.
Issues of the day are of no consequence importance or concern. Around the end of 3rd grade is when that begins. By 4th grade the differences in people is full on noticed.
From kindergarten until after the middle of 3rd grade they don't notice nor care about any of this which the left believes is so important
You don't remember your childhood, do you?
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
I did. You used the term yourself. Now you're trying to piss backwards.
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
I am going to listen to the game. I am dead serious when I say ti CJ I feel bad she was thinking about her sexuality at 5.
I also feel bad that you were never permitted to believe in Santa. With one caveat if it was because of your family's faith that is different.
Night all let's go Miami don't lose by more than 10.
" I am a socialist " Bernie Sanders
- carmenjonze
- Posts: 9614
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:06 am
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
Please come up with a different propagnda phrase.
Not every child is Christian, and a ton of Christian children don't believe in Santa.
Again would you want the teacher who is an evangelical Christian discussing homosexuality with your 7 year old. I know I wouldn't.
There is absolutely zero reason for teachers to discuss adult relationships with children K through 3.
My parents -- who were both ordained ministers -- were also public school teachers (union teachers, for that idiot JoeMemphis). My mother was credentialed for K-8 and my father for secondary school.
They knew they were limited by Engel v Vitale from imposing their own radically homophobic religious beliefs on school children.
I hope you're not suggesting that "evangelial Christian" teachers in 2022 aren't aware that they operate under the same law.
You keep saying this, and yet you still haven't learned about LGBTQ parent groups and organizations and what they say about these censorship/defunding laws.discuss adult relationships
________________________________
The way to right wrongs is to
Shine the light of truth on them.
~ Ida B. Wells
________________________________
The way to right wrongs is to
Shine the light of truth on them.
~ Ida B. Wells
________________________________
- carmenjonze
- Posts: 9614
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 3:06 am
Re: Is this the high-water mark of our freedoms? Must-see.
________________________________
The way to right wrongs is to
Shine the light of truth on them.
~ Ida B. Wells
________________________________
The way to right wrongs is to
Shine the light of truth on them.
~ Ida B. Wells
________________________________