IMO, he was plenty accurate in his initial comments. I and many others understood exactly what point he was making, and the point he was making was true.ShineOn » Tue Dec 22, 2015 1:57 am wrote:Sure, but why wasn't Cruz more accurate in his initial comments?
What's really going on??Why stir up emotions like that?
He is supposed to be a leader and in being one it is reasonable to expect that he will work towards helping people understand what is really going on, instead of pandering for votes.
When taken in its proper context, what he said is going on really is what is going on.
Yes, I understand politically correct "scientists" will ignore an individual's biological sex and happily label folks whatever they want to be labeled.Now, perhaps you also do not yet understand that these so-called boys who would be in the girls locker rooms "hanging out" with your and my daughters are not really boys. They have been carefully examined and identified as being girls that may have some anatomical features of boys; two varieties exist - boys that realize they are girls and true hermaphrodites. My impression is that the former is actually even less common than the latter; there are lots of hermaphrodites. It's a biological thing, you know.
Just more weird science, I suppose.